Give AGENTS.md a focused checkup

Find conflicting rules and deliver replacement passages.

Give AGENTS.md a focused checkup

Find conflicting rules and deliver replacement passages.

References & what we used

Full prompt
Review the AGENTS.md instructions that apply to this project and their direct references. Prioritize one substantial or conflicting file; if none exists, report that instead of creating rules.

Find repetition, contradictions, overly broad triggers and stale file references. Inspect command definitions without executing them. Retain at most five findings with a concrete effect on agent behavior.

For each, provide the original passage, evidence, and complete replacement text. Keep ambiguous permission, data-protection and acceptance boundaries intact and flag the ambiguity. Preserve necessary exceptions.

Completion means each finding points to its source and the proposed passages can be used without another drafting round. If no change is worthwhile, report the checked scope.

Execution contract:
Start directly. Do not ask me to approve a plan, choose files or fill in a template. Use only this project, this conversation and materials already provided; do not search unrelated projects or private history. Complete what the evidence supports and report missing inputs. If the task is inapplicable, explain why and stop without inventing a result.
Preserve existing files and uncommitted changes. Include complete proposed content in your reply; standalone artifacts may be saved under a new, unused filename. Do not install dependencies, change the environment, commit, push or deploy. Respect access and permission limits and report blocked work. Check your result once, deliver it and stop without asking whether to continue.